View Single Post
Old 11-22-2008, 01:06 PM   #20 (permalink)
Darth_Bill
Established Member
 
Darth_Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,661
Darth_Bill is a Credible MemberDarth_Bill is a Credible Member
Default Re: California prop 8

>Just as the RCC stopped offering help with Adoptions where they would have been forces to allow same sex couples adopt children,the LDS church does not allow it's Bishops to perform Weddings or Marriages in Masachussets.

The RCC stopped doing adoptions because it was accepting state money. If they were like LDS social services, that doesn't accept state money, they could have continued.

And Bishops not allowed to perform weddings...doesn't change the fact that the LDS church still does weddings in the Temple in Boston. We do have clergy licensed by the state. The state doesn't distinguish between bishops and sealers, they just see clergy. The restrictions placed on temple patrons doesn't bother the state at all. Are you sure this isn't just hear-say? It makes no sense to me. Proxy weddings aren't recognized by the state anyway so it wouldn't affect our work for the dead.
__________________

The OFFICIAL site of Darth Bill

"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one." - Einstein.

All Hail the Hypnotoad!
Darth_Bill is offline   Reply With Quote